Vanta
scroll / ↑ ↓ — one act per gesture  ·  N toggles notes
Notes
▾ scroll for more ▾
Tokenomics in Action

One token powers the first fully
decentralized prop firm.

How θ converts trader demand into burned and locked supply — mechanically, in code — plus buybacks from product revenue.

scroll
01 / 17
The space — prop trading 101

Firms stake traders. Profits get split.

the funded-trading model
TRADER skill · no capital PROP FIRM capital · rules FUNDED ACCOUNT firm money · trader skill profits split — trader keeps most

The deal

a trader pays a small fee for an evaluation — a trading test. Pass, and they trade the firm's capital, keeping most of the profits.

Why traders come

talent without capital is the oldest problem in trading — this converts skill into institutional-size buying power, from a laptop, anywhere.

Why firms exist

evaluation fees plus a share of winners' profits — a business built on finding trading talent at global scale.

02 / 17
The space — a quiet boom

Retail prop trading exploded.

active prop firms — industry trackers (approx.)
20202021 20222023 20242025 ~300 1,200+

The market leader

$213M revenue · 2023

per FTMO's public filings — ~$90M profit for 2023

The underlying markets

~$7T/day FX · 24/7 crypto

the deepest markets in the world — demand for access is proven

Huge demand — running on
closed, centralized, adversarial rails.
03 / 17
The problem — by design

The standard evaluation is engineered for failure.

the typical trader's journey
rule “violation” account terminated equity

The math trap

8–10% target · ~5% drawdown · small capital — the only fast way through is oversized trades

Capital vs time

pass honestly at 1–2%/month and it takes months — almost nobody waits. They size up, blow up, and buy another eval

The fix firms won't ship

raise the drawdown, or raise the funding. Nobody sustains 5%/mo — but 1–2%/mo on $1M is a career. Honest odds on real capital means paying winners

Churn and burn,
by design.
04 / 17
The problem — by business model

The house takes the other side.

b-booking — where your order actually goes
TRADER places an order PROP FIRM takes the other side runs pricing · spreads · fills MARKET never reached your loss = their revenue · your win = their liability hidden rules · mid-eval changes · denied payouts

2024 — how b-books exit

80–100 firms walked away

in a single year — fees banked, $50M+ of trader payouts left unpaid (Finance Magnates Intelligence / industry estimates)

The Funded Trader

80,000+ accounts — was denying withdrawals while still operating (its own CEO admitted $2M+ denied in two months), then froze payouts entirely (2024)

True Forex Funds

sold evaluations right up to the day it shut down — then closed owing traders ~$1.2M (2024)

When the house owes you money for winning,
the house finds a way not to pay.
What's coming Most b-books ban automated trading — the model only survives human mistakes. Agentic trading makes every trader better — b-books can't survive that. The next decade's winners will lean into it.
05 / 17
The flip

Vanta makes money when funding grows.

  • 100% profit split — every dollar of trader profit stays with the trader
  • Funding scales to $2.5M — quarterly, performance-gated
  • Open-source rules — every rule is public code; nothing hidden to invoke
  • Payouts verifiable on-chain — settled in public; built so denial isn't an option
  • Decentralized network — validators enforce the rules, not a desk with discretion
  • Proven traders are A-booked — backed in real markets, not bet against
It doesn't need traders to fail.
aligned incentives — funding grows, both win
eligible funding firm revenue ∝ funding
The analogy What the first fully decentralized exchange did to trading venues, Vanta does to the prop firm — open code, on-chain payouts, no house to trust.
06 / 17
Breaking the mold

Build. Prove. Then $1M.

BUILD — Vanta Labs

an agentic platform — a swarm of AI agents to develop & test strategies

PROVE — Pro accounts

a harder, honest test: Sharpe > 1 over 90+ days, realistic drawdown, no deadline

SCALE — $1M capital

release the proven strategy onto up to $1M — capital where 1–2%/mo is real money

Harder, on purpose

a 90-day, risk-adjusted gate filters skill from luck — it cannot be passed by gambling

The complete shift

churn-and-burn inverted: real strategies, real edge, risk-adjusted returns, on larger capital — a firm built on surviving traders, unlike the 80–100 that vanished in 2024

Real strategies. Real edge. Real capital.
07 / 17
Distribution — and the deepest break

Glitch distributes them. We A-book the best.

a-booked — via Glitch
PROVEN TRADER Pro-passed · Sharpe-gated GLITCH copy trading · retail follows REAL MARKETS A-booked — wins shared network revenue → θ buybacks & burns their success is the product — the opposite of the b-book casino

Glitch

retail copies the network's proven traders — built for SEC & CFTC compliance, entering a market where Wealthfront alone manages ~$100B

A-book

the best risk-adjusted strategies are A-booked via Glitch — routed into real markets, and their wins are our wins. The exact opposite of the b-book casino.

Back to θ

product revenue flows back as θ buybacks and burns

Decentralized & open source is the surface.
A model that only works when traders win is the moat.
08 / 17
The machine

Traders → miners → validators.

order flow, scored in real time
traders individual miner ENTITY prop firm · 1000s of subaccounts validators

Built on Bittensor — a decentralized network of independent subnetworks.
One subnet: 256 miner slots.

entity slots — each can carry thousands of traders

The utility at the center of it all: access to funding
delivered by smart contracts. Funding is the network's native utility.

09 / 17
θ — access to funding

Every account is paid for in θ.
Every registration burns it.

A $100,000 account — 1 θ = $5,000 of funding:

Trader pays cash

dollars to the entity miner — never tokens

Entity buys θ

that cash goes into the market for theta

20 θ → burned

≈ $140 at θ ≈ $7 · supply drops · account live

$ buy θ burn 🔥
θ supply
— every registration burns, permanently
10 / 17
The evaluation

The burn happens up front — pass or fail.

two demand events — burn at registration, lock at pass
EVERY REGISTRATION REGISTRATION account paid for in θ θ BURNED — UP FRONT permanent · no refund · no cap ON PASS — SEPARATELY TRADER PASSES funded on network capital MORE θ LOCKED margin — held while funded

Register

every registration burns θ up front — permanent, no refund, and no cap on registrations

Pass

hit the target inside the loss limits → trade network capital — and lock more θ as margin

Fail

the θ was already burned — demand never waits on outcomes

Registration burns θ. Passing locks more. Demand either way.
11 / 17
Margin — the bigger demand

Funded accounts lock 14× the registration.

θ locked per $100K account
registration 20 θ · burned margin ≈286 θ · locked while trading

Rule

10% margin · $35 per θ

posted in θ, held for as long as the trader trades

On losses

slashed — burned

losing θ is destroyed, permanently

No θ, no orders.
12 / 17
The business model

Dollars in. θ burned. Funded accounts out.

TRADERS pay in dollars VANTA TRADING flagship entity miner first prop firm on the network THE NETWORK θ bought · locked · burned FUNDED ACCOUNTS out the other side $ θ

Vanta Trading earns θ emissions in proportion to the PnL on the funding it fields — paid on performance, not volume, and never on failure.
And there is no other way to pay the network: every funded dollar routes through θ.

13 / 17
Already happening

Eligible funding: $2M → $10M in 30 days (June → July 2026).

Vanta Trading alone — eligible funding, observed & target (log scale, compressed above $100M)
$1M $10M $100M $1B June · $2M July · $10M end of Q3 · $100M $1B target · Q1 2027

5× in a single month — on our flagship entity miner alone.
Every dollar of it paying the network, in θ, for access to funding.

14 / 17
What $100M means for θ (estimates)

Demand is built into the fee schedule.

$100M through the fee schedule — in θ
burned — registrations ~20k θ locked — funded margin 14k+ θ burn is permanent · locks hold while accounts trade

Burned

~20k θ

≈ $140K of registrations — permanently removed from supply

Locked

14k+ θ

≈ $100K of margin — held for as long as funded accounts trade

At the $1B target (Q1 2027): 10× these figures — before touching the funding-per-θ dial.
15 / 17
Built to scale

How θ goes up.

New θ is emitted continuously — the growth of emissions is the supply side.
θ rises when demand grows faster than emissions. Three mechanisms drive that:

funding per θ — the demand dial
$5,000 / θ ▲ today ◀ more funding / θ less funding / θ ▶ less funding per θ → every funded dollar must buy, lock & burn MORE θ

1 · 0% miner burn — sustained by funding demand

no artificial burn of miner emissions is needed — organic funding demand (registration burns + margin locks) absorbs them. As eligible funding grows, the target is at minimum flat against emissions.

2 · Glitch revenue

product revenue buys back and burns θ — profits increase over time as distribution grows.

3 · The cost of funding — adjustable

the funding received per θ locked: today 1 θ = $5,000 → a $100K account locks 20 θ. At $2,500, it locks 40 θ — demand per funded dollar doubles. Set by network governance.

Net profitable, by design.
The model, plainly No miner burn. Emissions matched by funding demand — the utility, paid in θ. Profits compound via Glitch + A-booking.
16 / 17
The flywheel

The loop compounds.

θ
more traders
more funding
more θ burned & locked
scarcer token, bigger accounts
Vanta Network. Tokenomics in action.
17 / 17
The opportunity

How you participate.

The asset — θ

every mechanism in this deck — burns, locks, buybacks — accrues to one asset: the network's token.

How you win

funding growth converts to θ demand by fee schedule — $2M→$10M already did it at pilot scale; $100M and $1B multiply it.

How to get exposure

θ is SN8 — listed on Kraken. Buying SN8 is direct exposure to the flywheel.

Exposure is θ. The flywheel does the rest.